The comic

Since I was in middle school, I remember my love for comics. I read Calvin and Hobbes, Pearls before Swine, Peanuts and many more. Thats why when presented with the question "Do comics hold less literary value than normal books" I was particularly against the statement. Why would it? Because there are pictures and less words? Granted on the surface they might be simpler to read but often times comics can hold a much deeper meaning. In fact depending on the comic the argument could be made that a three panel comic is much deeper than a 900 page book written in size 8 font with no pictures. The drawings incorporated with the comic gives it an extra layer of depth, or a way to get a deeper layer of understanding. Take for example this comic. Any person who has read Calvin and Hobes recognizes the iconic wagon rides. Although it gives the impression of a light hearted comic, it undoubtably holds a second level of depth.

Image result for calvin and hobbes


I believe that the theres a certain level of stipulation surrounding comics. The fact that they're "childish" and easy to read deters a large audience that would otherwise enjoy them. Comics allow readers to gain an even deeper level of understanding which in my opinion is why it should be considered a more mainstream form of literature.

Comments

  1. Kendall HuangSeptember 29, 2019 at 5:58 PM

    Your thinking on comic books has really changed my opinion on it. I first thought that pictures truly had no meaning. But what you said about the novel Calvin and hobs makes sense. The book has pictures but also offers a lot of depth

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Perspective

Your perspective is something that typically you don't have a lot of control over. Personally I always believed that the only perspective I could even read from was that of a straight white man. However a class assignment showed me different. Initially I read on the black perspective on GG which proved very insightful. After also reading about the queer and female perspective I was left with several thoughts regarding changed perspectives in literature. For starters, when approaching a piece of literature you have leave any cultural bias you may have behind. What I mean by that is that when your trying to change perspectives, you have to fully immerse yourself in the other perspectives culture. The second detail I noticed was that in any novel   you could view the novel from pretty much any cultural sense. Taking GG for example, there were enough perspectives to be found to fill a book. It depends more on how hard and deep you're willing to look.
Read more

Sacrifice

The Korean War veterans memorial has stood as a reminder of what has been given up by others to protect Americas freedom. In class this week we looked at many diffrent memorials around the world because of our passage 'Postcards from the trenches'. Although this was said to be a harder passage I liked it because it had a very captivating writing style. I was able to go to Washington DC several years ago; while I was there I visited several monuments including the Vietnam and Korean War memorial. I remembered many things from this memorial after talking about it in class, including the many names we saw on the wall. I have a grandpa who served in the war who came with us, and while we were there he found some of his friends names. watching him find it was a very solemn moment that I reflected on while reading this piece. When I visited the Korean War memorial I remember seeing the inscription "Freedom is not free" on the Pool of Remembrance. At the time I didn't re...
Read more

The broken machine

      In "Civil Disobedience" the phrase that stood out to me most was when Henry Thoreau "Now what are they? Men at all? or small movable forts and magazines at the service of the men in power." Throughout this piece about government inefficiency, Thoreau touches on the governments treatment of the military. specifically the troops themselves.  I went back and reread the passage and had a few thoughts from this passage. For starters, this giant, ineffective government does not view its soldiers as people. Although it may try to preserve its troops, they achieve their goal by any means possible. Thoreau is right when he says "What are they, men at all? Or moveable forts and magazines? In my opinion this phrase although it applies to soldiers can apply to all people in general. Are we independent people or are we subject to the whim of the government. At another point Thoreau says “Witness the present Mexican American war, the work of a few indiv...
Read more